Diplomats may continue Iran nuclear talks past midnight deadline - Washington Post

Diplomats in Lausanne, Switzerland are scrambling Tuesday to reach consensus on the outline of an Iran nuclear deal just hours ahead of a self-imposed deadline to produce an agreement. (AP)

By Carol Morello March 31 at 1:30 PM

LAUSANNE, Switzerland — U.S. officials said Tuesday that they might continue negotiating a preliminary Iran nuclear deal past a midnight deadline as they struggled to resolve key issues.

“Our negotiators have determined, over the context of a mostly sleepless night last night . . . and today . . . they’re going to continue these conversations tomorrow, if necessary, and as long as the conversations continue to be productive,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters in Washington. His comment echoed that of a senior State Department official in Lausanne, who said the negotiators would “keep working if we are continuing to make progress, including into tomorrow, if it’s useful to do so.”

Earnest also said that President Obama was being closely briefed on the talks and would likely speak directly Tuesday with U.S. negotiators, who are led by Secretary of State John F. Kerry and Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz.

In a strong indication that an agreement might be imminent, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov flew back to Lausanne to take part in the last stretch of talks on Tuesday. He had left the negotiations on Monday, saying he would return only when there was a “realistic” chance of a deal.

The negotiations over Iran’s nuclear future have stretched on for more than a decade. In the current talks, the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia have been seeking restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program that would extend for a 15-year period, in exchange for a phased easing of the international sanctions that have hamstrung its economy.

Blocking Iran’s ability to build nuclear weapons has been a top priority of the White House since Obama assumed office in 2009 and, before that, under President George W. Bush.

Kerry, who spent Monday in meetings that dragged on until close to midnight, began the day Tuesday at 6 a.m. with a working breakfast with the U.S. negotiating team. At 7:30 a.m., the Iranians started meeting with diplomats from all six nations conducting the negotiations.

[Poll: Clear majority supports nuclear deal with Iran]

Even at the 11th hour, wide differences had remained over the pace at which sanctions would be lifted, and what limits might be imposed on Iran in the final years of a 15-year accord.

“I’ve been telling the German media we’re in a bit of a crisis with the talks,” German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told a BBC reporter at the breakfast buffet.

The deadline of midnight in Switzerland, or 6 p.m. Eastern time, was self-imposed. When talks were extended in November, Kerry said that if the parties did not have a broad agreement by the end of March, Obama would have to reassess whether to continue the negotiations.

Members of Congress had threatened to expand sanctions against Iran if there was no progress. The White House has warned that that could push Iran to walk away from the table entirely and resume its nuclear program full tilt.

But several of the other countries negotiating alongside the United States have not felt such urgency, and pointed out the real deadline is June 30 when an interim agreement expires.

[A framework? A deal? The semantics of the talks.]

As the deadline approached, the negotiators worked to settle some core issues: What kind of nuclear research would Iran be allowed to pursue in the final five years of a 15-year accord? When can the United Nations’ sanctions be eased? Will the sanctions be lifted or merely suspended so that they can be slapped back into place if Iran does not meet its commitments?

In Jerusalem, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement before the talks ended, saying that the negotiators were turning a blind eye to Iranian “aggression” as shown by its support for Houthi rebels in Yemen.

“The agreement being formulated in Lausanne sends a message that there is no price for aggression and, on the contrary, that Iran’s aggression is to be rewarded,” he said.

“The moderate and responsible countries in the region, especially Israel and also many other countries, will be the first to be hurt by this agreement. One cannot understand that when forces supported by Iran continue to conquer more ground in Yemen, in Lausanne they are closing their eyes to this aggression.”

[Fact-checking Obama’s reference to “unprecedented” nuclear inspections]

The Tuesday deadline was considered crucial for U.S. negotiators, because Obama and Kerry said earlier that if a framework agreement was not reached by then, they would have to assess whether to continue the process. But an interim agreement, under which Iran has limited its nuclear output, does not expire until June 30. Negotiators from France, Germany, Britain, China and Russia had expressed less urgency about getting some sort of understanding outlined by midnight Tuesday.

Karen DeYoung in Washington and William Booth in Jerusalem contributed to this report.

Read more

Poll: Clear majority supports nuclear deal with Iran

A framework? A deal? The semantics of the talks.

Carol Morello is the diplomatic correspondent for The Washington Post, covering the State Department.

Continue reading 10 minutes left

Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1Ij8PsS