HTTP/1.1 302 Found Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:32:34 GMT Server: Apache Set-Cookie: NYT-S=deleted; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT; path=/; domain=www.stg.nytimes.com Set-Cookie: NYT-S=0MdzUgr6gOgQzDXrmvxADeHFETn6Sw4YC9deFz9JchiAIUFL2BEX5FWcV.Ynx4rkFI; expires=Fri, 03-Oct-2014 00:32:34 GMT; path=/; domain=.nytimes.com Location: http://ift.tt/1rgwGUj Content-Length: 0 nnCoection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache Cache-Control: no-cache Channels: NytNow Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:32:34 GMT X-Varnish: 614976969 614960976 Age: 244 Via: 1.1 varnish X-Cache: HIT X-API-Version: 5-5 X-PageType: article Connection: close 0022a9
http://nyti.ms/1qY4bGY
- Charles M. Blow
- David Brooks
- Frank Bruni
- Roger Cohen
- Gail Collins
- Ross Douthat
- Maureen Dowd
- Thomas L. Friedman
- Nicholas Kristof
- Paul Krugman
- Joe Nocera
- Charles M. Blow
- David Brooks
- Frank Bruni
- Roger Cohen
- Gail Collins
- Ross Douthat
- Maureen Dowd
- Thomas L. Friedman
- Nicholas Kristof
- Paul Krugman
- Joe Nocera
Perez Hilton has made a career of posting anything and everything about celebrities and their lives. On Tuesday, he thought better of it.
Mr. Hilton helped a trove of nude celebrity photos spread like wildfire across the Internet over Labor Day weekend. The photos, which included images of stars like Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton, became available after someone â and who did it is unknown â posted the pictures to 4chan and Reddit, two hugely popular anonymous online message boards. There they quickly became trading fodder among the sitesâ regulars.
On Sunday, after the photos were posted to these message boards, Google searches for the term âJennifer Lawrenceâ shot through the roof, according to data from Google Trends.
Continue reading the main story
Related Coverage
-
State of the Art: Web Trolls Winning as Incivility IncreasesAUG. 14, 2014
-
Can Reddit Grow Up?JULY 27, 2014
The images are hardly the first nude celebrity pictures to make their way online. But their publication has touched off a larger discussion on the state of privacy and civil liberties on the Internet. Some privacy advocates are focusing on the role that big tech companies play in policing â or not policing â users who repeatedly push the boundaries of taste, or those who post controversial content like the videos of the beheadings of the journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff.
Mr. Hilton and others are even soul-searching whether individuals should be exercising self-restraint in viewing questionable content.
Mr. Hilton published a video on YouTube, in which he expressed remorse that he had publicized the photos. âI view this as a good opportunity to learn from and grow from, and to make some changes going forward,â he said.
Continue reading the main story
His regrets were echoed across Twitter, where users like Seth Rogen and Lena Dunham urged others not to share or view the images out of respect for the celebritiesâ privacy. Even on Reddit, moderators of the sub-forums featuring the images were questioning whether they should take the pictures down. (Although they are still up.)
For privacy advocates, though, the responsibility lies with the big tech companies that host this kind of content.
The incident âshould be treated like a sex crime, a privacy invasion taken to an extreme,â said Jules Polonetsky, executive director of the Future of Privacy Forum, a Washington advocacy group. âSites allowing the sharing of these pictures can and should be taking proactive action to remove these pictures.â
Recently, Twitter came under fire for its loose stance on what is permissible on its network of 271 million monthly users when Robin Williamsâs daughter quit the service after being attacked via Twitter messages about her fatherâs death.
And after the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, a terrorist organization, posted to YouTube videos of the beheadings of James Foley and Steven Sotloff, two American journalists, some made calls for more stringent guidelines on the services. Many users urged people to take matters into their own hands, advocating not viewing the video.
Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story
âWe respect Steven Sotloff and wonât air images of his death, or him in a jumpsuit,â Al Jazeera, the media network based in Doha, Qatar, said in a statement posted to its public relations Twitter account on Tuesday, using the hashtag â#ISISmediaBlackout.â âWe suggest all media do the same.â
But Twitter, YouTube and Reddit take a decidedly hands-off approach to censoring content that appears on their networks, relying instead on users to flag objectionable material that may or may not end up being taken down. âYouTube has clear policies that outline what content is acceptable to post on YouTube, and we remove videos violating these policies when flagged by our users,â a YouTube spokeswoman said in a statement.
On Reddit, a site whose users are well known for a libertarian, laissez-faire approach to community censorship, the photos were quickly embraced. At least one subforum was dedicated to discussing and trading them.
Reddit did not respond to a request for comment. In the past, the siteâs policy has been to allow its users to police themselves, letting self-appointed community moderators decide what is and is not appropriate to appear on the site.
When the photos began to surface on the web, some news reports suggested that Appleâs online storage service, iCloud, had been breached.
But Apple firmly denied this speculation, saying on Tuesday that while at least some celebrity accounts were individually attacked, the incident was not the result of any widespread attack on Appleâs software products.
âNone of the cases we have investigated has resulted from any breach in any of Appleâs systems,â Nat Kerris, an Apple spokeswoman, said in a statement. âWe are continuing to work with law enforcement to help identify the criminals involved.â
A spokeswoman for Ms. Lawrence, who verified that the photos of her client were real, said she was in touch with law enforcement and would prosecute those who posted the stolen pictures.
Twitter, YouTube and others may ultimately decide to take a more active approach to policing user-generated content. Twitter has already shown some signs of change. But this is a fine line to tread, as these companies have long trumpeted their democratic approach to unfettered online speech.
If these services were altered significantly, civil liberties advocates fear it could inhibit how people are able to express themselves online.
âWhile a rule against hate speech might prevent rape threats, it could also stifle political speech,â said Jillian C. York, a director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an online civil liberties organization. âCompanies have demonstrated that they canât be trusted as arbiters of speech.â
Instead, Ms. York said, Internet users themselves should be able to do a better job of self-policing. âWe should encourage companies like Twitter and Facebook to put tools in place that allow users to more easily filter out content and block abusive individuals,â Ms. York said.
For some, though, the damage has already been done.
âTo those of you looking at photos I took with my husband years ago in the privacy of our home, hope you feel great about yourselves,â the actress Mary Elizabeth Winstead, whose nude pictures were leaked on 4chan and Reddit, said in a series of Twitter posts on Sunday.
Continue reading the main story
Ms. Winstead said she was abandoning the Internet for the time being, because of a barrage of personal attacks on Twitter after the photos surfaced online.
âI can only imagine the creepy effort that went into this,â Ms. Winstead said.
More on nytimes.com
Site Index
Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1qmMMeQ
0 comments:
Post a Comment