:::: MENU ::::

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Ukraine's restive east slipping from government's grasp - Reuters




HORLIVKA, Ukraine Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:10pm EDT







1 of 8. Pro-Russian armed men stand at the entrance to the regional government headquarters in Luhansk, eastern Ukraine, April 30, 2014.


Credit: Reuters/Vasily Fedosenko





HORLIVKA, Ukraine (Reuters) - Pro-Moscow separatists seized government offices in more Ukrainian towns on Wednesday, in a further sign that authorities in Kiev are losing control of the country's eastern industrial heartland bordering Russia.



Gunmen who turned up at dawn took control of official buildings in Horlivka, a town of almost 300,000 people, said a Reuters photographer. They refused to be photographed.



The heavily armed men wore the same military uniforms without insignia as other unidentified "green men" who have joined pro-Russian protesters with clubs and chains in seizing control of towns across Ukraine's Donbass coal and steel belt.



Some 30 pro-Russian separatists also seized a city council building in Alchevsk, further east in Luhansk region, Interfax-Ukraine news agency said. They took down the Ukrainian flag and flew a city banner before allowing workers to leave.



Attempts to contain the insurgency by the government in Kiev have proved largely unsuccessful, with security forces repeatedly outmaneuvered by the separatists. The West and the new Ukrainian government accuse Russia of being behind the unrest, a charge Moscow denies.



Daniel Baer, the U.S. ambassador to the OSCE, a European security watchdog which has monitors in the region, told reporters in Vienna: "I think it's very clear that what is happening would not be happening without Russian involvement."



A police official in Donetsk, the provincial capital where separatists have declared a "People's Republic of Donetsk", said separatists were also in control of the Horlivka police station, having seized the regional police headquarters earlier in April.



The murder of a town councilor from Horlivka who opposed the separatists was cited by Kiev last week among reasons for launching new efforts to regain control of the region.



Wednesday's takeovers followed the fall of the main government buildings on Tuesday further east in Luhansk, capital of Ukraine's easternmost province, driving home just how far control over the densely populated region has slipped from the central government in Kiev.



"They've taken them. The government administration and police," the police official said of Horlivka.



SECESSION REFERENDUM



The town sits just north of Donetsk, unofficial capital of the whole Donbass area, where mainly Russian-speaking separatists have called a referendum on secession for May 11.



Many hope to follow Crimea's break from Ukraine in March and subsequent annexation by Russia, following the overthrow of Ukraine's Moscow-backed president Viktor Yanukovich in late February in a tug-of-war between the West and Russia over the strategic direction of the former Soviet republic.



The Donbass region is home to giant steel smelters and heavy plants that produce up to a third of Ukraine's industrial output. An armed uprising began there in early April, with Kiev almost powerless to respond for fear of provoking an invasion by tens of thousands of Russian troops massed on the border.



Many Russian-speaking business "oligarchs" from the Donbass backed Yanukovich and exercise great influence over the region.



On Wednesday, the most powerful of these, Ukraine's richest man Rinat Akhmetov issued a formal statement saying he remained committed to his investments in the Donbass and to keeping the region as part of Ukraine.



Oleksander Turchynov, Ukraine's acting president until after an election on May 25, reiterated on Wednesday that police were incapable of reasserting control in the region.



"Our main task is to prevent the terrorist threat from spreading to other regions of Ukraine," he told a meeting of regional governors in Kiev.



"The Russian leadership is doing everything to prevent the election. But the election will take place on May 25," he said.



The OSCE special envoy to Ukraine, Tim Guldimann, told Reuters he was cautiously optimistic about the possibility of holding an election which Kiev says Russia is trying to wreck:



"What's positive is that no political parties have so far called for a boycott of the election," Guldimann said. "Governors and mayors in the east have also indicated that elections will be carried out."



There were further signs on Monday that Russia is paying an economic price for its involvement in Ukraine. The International Monetary Fund said international sanctions imposed on Moscow over the crisis in Ukraine were hurting the economy.



The IMF cut its 2014 growth forecast for Russia to 0.2 percent from 1.3 percent and forecast capital outflows of $100 billion this year.



The IMF mission chief to Russia, Antonio Spilimbergo, also told reporters that Russia was "experiencing recession" and that a resolution of the Ukraine crisis would significantly reduce Russia's own economic uncertainties.



"If you understand by recession two quarters of negative economic growth then Russia is experiencing recession now," Spilimbergo said.



Ukraine is also suffering from the turmoil, with economic output falling 1.1 percent year-on-year in the first three months of 2014, according to government figures released on Wednesday. Gazprom said Ukraine's unpaid bill for gas supplied by the Russian energy giant was now $3.5 billion.



However, the European Union said it was ready to provide economic aid to Ukraine along with the IMF.



(Additional reporting by Pavel Polityuk, Natalia Zinets and Elizabeth Piper in Kiev, Lidia Kelly in Moscow; Writing by Matt Robinson and Giles Elgood, Editing by Peter Millership and Alastair Macdonald)












Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1iJLZRI

Oklahoma Governor Says Execution Probe Will Be 'Independent' - NBCNews.com


Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin said she has tapped her public-safety commissioner to lead a state review of the botched execution of Clayton Lockett and an independent pathologist to declare a cause of death.


Fallin took no questions after delivering a brief statement on Wednesday afternoon, which began with a recitation of Lockett's crimes — he shot one woman and repeatedly raped another — and a summary of his failed appeals.


"I believe the legal process worked. I believe the death penalty is an appropriate response and punishment to those who commit heinous crimes," Fallin said.


But, she added, the state needs to be "certain" its execution protocols are proper and so authorized what she called "an independent review."





This Video Player Requires JavaScript


It has come to our attention that the browser you are using is either not running javascript or out of date. Please enable javascript and/or update your browser if possible.





Department of Public Safety Commissioner Michael Thompson will be asked to report back on the cause of Lockett's death and whether the Department of Corrections followed its protocol, and make recommendations to improve the execution process.


She said the execution of Charles Warner, who was supposed to be killed two hours after Lockett, would be postponed until the review is completed.


Lockett and Warner fought to have their executions put on hold until the state agreed to reveal the source of its new three-drug cocktail.


When the state Supreme Court issued a stay of execution, Fallin accused the justices of overstepping their bounds and the state attorney general said the ruling had created a constitutional crisis. The court then reversed the stay and green-lighted the executions.


Image: Charles Warner, Clayton LockettOklahoma Department of Corrections / AP file

Charles Warner, left and Clayton Lockett, right.



Witnesses reported that three minutes after Lockett was declared unconscious, he had a violent reaction, lifted his head and body from the gurney several times, and mumbled.


Prison officials halted the execution and later said an intravenous line had blown. They also said Lockett then died of a massive heart attack.


— Tracy Connor




This Video Player Requires JavaScript


It has come to our attention that the browser you are using is either not running javascript or out of date. Please enable javascript and/or update your browser if possible.





First published April 30 2014, 12:10 PM









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1iJGaDP

Senator: Benghazi emails reveal White House misinformation - NavyTimes.com


Republicans say emails released Tuesday on the attack in Benghazi, Libya, include “the smoking gun” that shows a White House official urged that the assault on the U.S. consulate be blamed on a protest that never happened.


The emails, obtained by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act request, include one in which White House official Ben Rhodes lists “goals” for then-U.N. ambassador Susan Rice to meet in explaining the attack and protests occurring across the Middle East that week to the American public.


Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in the assault, which the White House subsequently acknowledged was an al-Qaida-linked terror attack.


The email, sent to various officials including White House spokesman Jay Carney, said one goal was “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”


Another goal was “to reinforce the president and administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.”


Rhodes is assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communication and speechwriting.


During appearances on five Sunday news programs, Rice did blame the attack on Sept. 11, 2012, on a protest against an anti-Islam video produced by an American. So did Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, and President Obama would not say whether it was a terrorist attack until several days later.


The CIA station chief in Libya reported from the beginning that the attack was an al-Qaida-linked operation and that there was no protest. Though there was some dispute over the manner of the attack, former CIA deputy director Mike Morell testified earlier this month that he had no idea where the story about a video protest came from when he saw Rice make the claim on television.


Republicans say the protest story emanated from a White House bent on protecting the president from charges that he was wrong to claim during his campaign in 2012 that al-Qaida was on its heels.


Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., called the emails “a smoking gun” that points to White House efforts “to shape the story” of what happened in Benghazi.


Rather than have Rice provide “the best information that was available” in her TV appearances, the administration’s goal was “to put a political stance on a disaster six weeks before an election,” Graham said.


The White House said it relied on the best intelligence available at the time, and when better intelligence arrived, the story was clarified.


Bernadette Meehan, spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said Rhodes’ email contains general talking points on unrest spreading throughout the Middle East and North Africa at the time.


“There were protests taking place across the region in reaction to an offensive Internet video, so that’s what these points addressed,” Meehan said in an email.


Protests in Cairo; Sanaa, Yemen; Khartoum, Sudan; and Tunis, Tunisia, and early reports of similar protests in Benghazi “contributed to questions of how the attack began,” she said.


The emails also show that then-deputy national security adviser Denis McDonough, on Rhodes’ behalf, assigned Clinton aide Jake Sullivan to work with Morell to finalize the initial talking points on Benghazi. At that time, the talking points did not include the story about the video protests.









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1kpHHfW

Observers invited to attend Donetsk referendum - election chief - The Voice of Russia


He said that a number of foreign organizations and individuals have expressed their interest in the popular vote. "The Polish consul in Donetsk demonstrates huge interest. He is an observer and it is important for him to understand what is going on. I personally reply to questions from anyone interested. I answer all questions openly and frankly," the official said.


A co-chairman of the Russian Public Chamber’s working group on electoral monitoring, Georgy Fyodorov, said the organization was ready to send its observers to referendums in Donetsk and Lugansk once a formal invitation is received. A number of eastern and southern Ukrainian regions, as well as the Republic of Crimea, refused to recognize the legitimacy of the interim authorities and called for a referendum on the status of their regions within the country.


Pro-federalization rallies have not been abating in Ukraine's eastern cities of Kharkov, Lugansk and Donetsk since March. The protests have spread to a number of cities in the Donetsk region. In early April, protesters in the city of Donetsk seized local government buildings and proclaimed the creation of the People's Republic of Donetsk. They scheduled a popular vote on independence from Ukraine on May 11.


Donetsk referendum to take place soon, 2000 polling stations ready


The Central Election Commission of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic has set up over 2,000 polling stations and 55 electoral commissions for the upcoming referendum, the head of the Election Commission told RIA Novosti Wednesday.


"We have been engaged in the organizational work and preparations for the referendum for about a month. We have done a lot during this time; we set up 55 election commissions and 2,279 polling stations. We have finished the procedure that usually takes any state three months in a month," Roman Lyagin said.


The referendum on the status of the Donetsk region is scheduled for May 11. Citizens are to answer the question - "Do you support the act on state independence of the Donetsk People's Republic?" Lyagin also specified that over 25,000 members of election commissions "from all territorial districts of the Donetsk region" will be monitoring the referendum. A 70 percent voter turnover is expected in the upcoming vote.


Lyagin stressed that the republic has enough funds to carry out the referendum. "We are holding the referendum on the peoples' initiative. The budget is minimal. These are mostly donations from ordinary citizens," Lyagin said, adding that the printing of ballots will cost about 100,000 grivna (about $9,000). He also specified that the printing equipment was "provided by our partners. We did not buy it." The results of the referendum will be made public on May 12. The activist said that it would signal a starting point. "We will get the right to self-determination and decide the future of our region. If the majority of voters say a 'yes', presidential election slated for May 25 will not take place in the Donetsk region," Lyagin stressed. Citizens of some Ukrainian eastern and southern regions refused to recognize the legitimacy of the interim that came into power following the overthrow of President Yanukovich in February and have been staging pro-federalization rallies since March. In early April protesters in the city of Donetsk seized buildings of local government and proclaimed creation of People's Republic of Donetsk. They appointed a referendum on self-determination on May 11.









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1kpHERh

Kiev says it's 'helpless' to restore order in east - USA TODAY



Pro-Russia activists storm several official buildings in the eastern Ukrainian city of Luhansk and fire on police headquarters. Video provided by Reuters Newslook



Peter Leonard, Associated Press 8:48 a.m. EDT April 30, 2014




SHARE 60 MORE

HORLIVKA, Ukraine (AP) — Ukraine's police and security forces are "helpless" to quell unrest in two eastern regions bordering Russia, and in some cases are cooperating with pro-Russian gunmen who have seized scores of government buildings and taken people hostage, the country's acting president said Wednesday.


Oleksandr Turchynov said the goal now was to prevent the agitation from spreading to other territories.


"I will be frank: Today, security forces are unable to quickly take the situation in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions under control," Turchynov said at a meeting with regional governors.


"The security bodies … are unable to carry out their duties of protecting citizens. They are helpless in those matters. Moreover, some of those units are either helping or cooperating with terrorist organizations."


Turchynov instructed the governors to try to prevent the threat from overtaking more central and southern regions.


"Mercenaries and special units that are active on Ukrainian territory have been tasked with attacking those regions. That is why I am stressing: our task is to stop the spread of the terrorist threat first of all in the Kharkiv and Odessa regions," Turchynov was quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency.


Russia has placed tens of thousands of troops near the border with Ukraine and Turchynov said the threat of a Russian invasion was real. He called on creating regional self-defense units throughout the country, according to Interfax.


He spoke hours after pro-Russian gunmen seized more administrative buildings in eastern Ukraine. Insurgents wielding automatic weapons took control and hoisted an insurgent flag on top of the city council building Wednesday morning in the city of Horlivka in the Donetsk region. They also took control of a police station in the city, adding to another police building which they had controlled for several weeks.


An Associated Press reporter saw armed men standing guard outside the building and checking the documents of those entering. One of the men said that foreign reporters will not be allowed in and threatened to arrest those who don't obey orders. Similar guards were also seen outside the police station in the city.


The insurgents now control buildings in about a dozen cities in eastern Ukraine, demanding broader regional rights as well as greater ties or outright annexation by Russia. The militiamen are holding some activists and journalists hostage, including a group of observers from a European security organization.


In Luhansk, one of the largest cities in eastern Ukraine, gunmen in camouflage uniforms maintained control of several government offices they seized Tuesday.


Eastern Ukraine, which has a large Russian-speaking population, was the heartland of support for Viktor Yanukovych, the ousted president who fled to Russia in February. The government that replaced him in Kiev has resisted the insurgents' demands, fearing they could lead to a breakup of the country or mean that more regions could join Russia, as Crimea did.


Kiev and Western governments accuse Moscow of orchestrating the protests in eastern Ukraine. The United States and the European Union rolled out a fresh set of economic sanctions against Russia this week, but Moscow has remained unbowed, denying its role in the unrest and saying the actions were Kiev's fault.


SHARE 60 MORE








Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1kpCPrc

NBA Owner Believes Donald Sterling Ouster Vote Will Be Unanimous - ABC News




Copy

One of the 29 NBA team owners who will decide whether Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling will be forced to sell the team says he believes the vote will be unanimous.


“The owners I know are all color blind and they found that this behavior was outrageous, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it isn’t a unanimous vote,” Sacramento Kings majority owner Vivek Ranadive said today on “Good Morning America.” “I would be very surprised if that was not the case.”


Sterling’s courtside seat was noticeably empty Tuesday night as the Clippers defeated the Golden State Warriors to take a 3-2 lead in the playoffs series.


“The team is having its best run ever and he’s not going to be able to watch that,” Ranadive said. “He would be the most scorned man in the stands, so I think this is the time to step up and do the right thing.”


Breaking Down the Donald Sterling Scandal: The Audio, The Lawsuits, the Reactions


What We Know About V. Stiviano, Woman Accused of Leaking Racist Rant


NAACP Willing to 'Forgive' Clippers' Donald Sterling After Yanking Award


ESPN: Full Coverage


A two-thirds vote in favor of forcing Sterling to sell the team is needed by Ranadive and his fellow owners. Sterling, who has owned the team since 1991, was given a lifetime ban and a fine of $2.5 million by NBA Commissioner Adam Silver after Sterling was recorded making racist comments about African-Americans.


The woman who recorded the comments that have ended Sterling’s NBA career, Vanessa Stiviano, broke her silence for the first time overnight in a rant captured on camera in which she declared she was going to run for president.


Earlier Tuesday, while Stiviano, 31, was seen roller skating with an oversized visor covering her face, her attorney released a statement saying she was “very saddened” by the NBA’s decision to ban Sterling for life.


“My client is devastated that this got out,” Stiviano’s attorney, Marc Nehoray, told the Los Angeles Times, adding his client “never wanted any harm to Donald.”


The phone calls recorded a man the NBA deemed to be Sterling telling Stiviano to not post photos with or attend Clippers games with black men, including Hall of Famer Magic Johnson.


Today, Sterling’s fellow owner, Ranadive, said Johnson is just one person that 80-year-old Sterling needs to apologize to.


“What I would say to Mr. Sterling is, Mr. Sterling, do the right thing now,” Ranadive said. “Apologize to Magic Johnson. Apologize to the NBA, fans, the black community, the world at large.”


“Respect the wishes of the NBA. Put the team up for sale. Take some of the profits and donate them to a good cause,” he said.


ABC News' Colleen Curry and Dan Good contributed to this report.









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1kpCPaH

NBA Owner Believes Donald Sterling Ouster Vote Will Be Unanimous - ABC News




Copy

One of the 29 NBA team owners who will decide whether Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling will be forced to sell the team says he believes the vote will be unanimous.


“The owners I know are all color blind and they found that this behavior was outrageous, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it isn’t a unanimous vote,” Sacramento Kings majority owner Vivek Ranadive said today on “Good Morning America.” “I would be very surprised if that was not the case.”


Sterling’s courtside seat was noticeably empty Tuesday night as the Clippers defeated the Golden State Warriors to take a 3-2 lead in the playoffs series.


“The team is having its best run ever and he’s not going to be able to watch that,” Ranadive said. “He would be the most scorned man in the stands, so I think this is the time to step up and do the right thing.”


Breaking Down the Donald Sterling Scandal: The Audio, The Lawsuits, the Reactions


What We Know About V. Stiviano, Woman Accused of Leaking Racist Rant


NAACP Willing to 'Forgive' Clippers' Donald Sterling After Yanking Award


ESPN: Full Coverage


A two-thirds vote in favor of forcing Sterling to sell the team is needed by Ranadive and his fellow owners. Sterling, who has owned the team since 1991, was given a lifetime ban and a fine of $2.5 million by NBA Commissioner Adam Silver after Sterling was recorded making racist comments about African-Americans.


The woman who recorded the comments that have ended Sterling’s NBA career, Vanessa Stiviano, broke her silence for the first time overnight in a rant captured on camera in which she declared she was going to run for president.


Earlier Tuesday, while Stiviano, 31, was seen roller skating with an oversized visor covering her face, her attorney released a statement saying she was “very saddened” by the NBA’s decision to ban Sterling for life.


“My client is devastated that this got out,” Stiviano’s attorney, Marc Nehoray, told the Los Angeles Times, adding his client “never wanted any harm to Donald.”


The phone calls recorded a man the NBA deemed to be Sterling telling Stiviano to not post photos with or attend Clippers games with black men, including Hall of Famer Magic Johnson.


Today, Sterling’s fellow owner, Ranadive, said Johnson is just one person that 80-year-old Sterling needs to apologize to.


“What I would say to Mr. Sterling is, Mr. Sterling, do the right thing now,” Ranadive said. “Apologize to Magic Johnson. Apologize to the NBA, fans, the black community, the world at large.”


“Respect the wishes of the NBA. Put the team up for sale. Take some of the profits and donate them to a good cause,” he said.


ABC News' Colleen Curry and Dan Good contributed to this report.









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/PRpSwF

Minimum Wage Boost Blocked in Senate - NBCNews.com


A Democratic bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $10.10 was met with overwhelming Republican opposition in the Senate today, where it failed to garner the 60 votes needed to move past a key procedural hurdle.


The bill, which was introduced by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), would have raised the federal minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $10.10 per hour over the next 30 months, after which automatic annual increases in the minimum wage would be executed to account for inflation. Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee was the only Republican who voted in favor of letting a debate on the measure proceed; it failed by a margin of 54-42.


Following the vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said of Republicans who oppose the wage hike, "They're fighting for the billionaires, we're fighting for people who are struggling to make a living."


Republicans have said the measure would kill jobs.


The federal minimum wage has been increased 22 times since it was first implemented in 1938, most recently in 2007 when it was raised from $5.15 per hour to the current $7.25 per hour by Democrats who had just gained control of both chambers of Congress. The annual pay for a full-time minimum wage worker currently sits at $14,500, which is below the poverty line for a household of more than one person.





It has come to our attention that the browser you are using is either not running javascript or out of date. Please enable javascript and/or update your browser if possible.





Public sentiment is on the side of an increase, with 63 percent of Americans saying they would support a minimum wage hike to $10.10 per hour in a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll; but the issue is steeped in politics, with Democrats and President Barack Obama arguing that it will help tens of millions of low income workers climb out of poverty, and Republicans saying that it will only hurt workers by destroying the jobs they need.


Both sides have studies to back up their claims.


According to an analysis of Harkin’s bill by the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute, the bill would “directly or indirectly raise the wages of 27.8 million workers,” resulting in about $35 billion in additional wages in the next 30 months. EPI also says the bill would create “roughly 85,000 net new jobs” over that same period of time.


The EPI analysis argues that higher wages for lower-income workers will equal more spending, which will subsequently result in higher demand that would boost the economy and could result in the need to hire more workers.


“Senate Republicans assert that increasing the minimum wage will not help working families, that assertion is not only wrong, Mr. President, it makes no sense, it's illogical,” Reid said Wednesday on the Senate floor. “Twenty-eight million Americans stand to benefit from an increase in the minimum wage.”


But Republicans point to a report released by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) in February which says that a federal minimum wage hike to $10.10 per hour could reduce total employment in the United States by as many as one million jobs by the end of 2016, while at the same time resulting in more than 16.5 million people seeing a pay bump of a total estimated $31 billion.


The CBO says that a possible reduction in employment would be due to a number of factors, such as employers passing off the increased costs of workers to consumers, who would then spend less as a result. If a business is producing fewer foods and services because of lower spending by consumers they could hire fewer workers, the CBO says.


Even if the bill had made it through the Democrat-controlled Senate, its fate in the Republican-led House was grim, where House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has been opposed to such measures for decades. Boehner, who in 1996 told The Weekly Standard “I’ll commit suicide before I vote on a clean minimum-wage bill,” reiterated his opposition to the bill again Wednesday through a spokesman.


“The American people are asking, where are the jobs?” Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said in a statement. “But Washington Democrats are pushing policies that would make matters worse, like a minimum wage hike that the CBO says could cost up to a million jobs.”


But Democrats both in the House and Senate see their support for the minimum wage hike, and Republicans’ opposition, as a winning position going into the mid-term elections in November. House Democrats filed a ‘discharge petition’ in February in an attempt to force a vote on a measure to raise the minimum wage to $10.10, but it has only received 195 of the needed 218 signatures, all of which are Democrats.


“House Republicans will have to explain to voters why they oppose raising the minimum wage but will go to the mat for a minimum subsidy for oil companies,” DCCC Chairman Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY) said in a statement. “This election will be about who’s got the back of the middle class, and there are few contrasts more striking than Republicans’ opposition to raising the minimum wage but support for corporate tax breaks.”


Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, says the fact that Republicans oppose the measure is more of an issue of “trust,” saying it’s another example of a do-nothing Congress not acting on an issue Americans care about.


“I think it will make people ask the question, why elect folks if you’re not going to do anything?” Becerra told NBC News. “I think what it does is erodes trust and confidence among the American people for their elected leaders, and I think Republicans in the House do nothing at their peril.”


In a statement Wednesday, Harkin said, "Today’s vote was only a first step. I plan to bring this issue up again and again until American workers get the raise they deserve. This is the start of our fight on minimum wage, not the end.”


First published April 30 2014, 9:38 AM









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/PRpSww

GOP senators block minimum-wage hike but Democrats vow to try again - Los Angeles Times


Reporting from Washington—


A top election-year proposal from Democrats -- a bid to raise the federal minimum wage -- was rejected by Republicans in the Senate, who blocked legislation Wednesday to boost the rate to $10.10 an hour.


President Obama has turned the plight of the nation's low-wage workers into a battle cry for Democrats as they try to appeal to voters while the economy continues to sputter. Several states have advanced their own wage hikes amid congressional inaction.


"It's time for Republicans in Congress to listen to the majority of Americans who say it's time to give America a raise," the president said before the midday vote.


However, the effort made little headway with Republicans, who argued that the rate hike would cost jobs. The measure was blocked by a GOP filibuster on a party-line vote, 54-42.


Republican Sen. Mike Enzi of Wyoming said the minimum-wage jobs he held as young man -- a window washer and "stock boy" -- prepared him for eventually owning his own business.


"These are jobs where we learn to be dependable, to work with other employees and to learn that work ethic," Enzi said. Today's workers, he noted, often "don't know how to interrupt their texting to wait on a customer."


The proposal would have initially boosted the minimum wage, now $7.25 an hour, to $8.20, then again in 95-cent increments over two years to $10.10.


A Congressional Budget Office report said a higher rate would reduce employment by about 500,000 workers, but noted that "many more" would see an increase in earnings. Studies show about 28 million Americans earn the minimum wage.


The White House initially considered a more modest increase to about $9 an hour, but Democrats in Congress pushed for the higher rate, which would be the first since President George W. Bush increased the $5.15 hourly rate after Democrats became the majority in Congress in 2007.


The issue had threatened to divide Democrats in an election year when several conservative-state senators are up for reelection.


But Tuesday, all Democrats voted to advance the measure, except Sen. Mark Pryor, who was in his home state of Arkansas after the week's devastating storms.


One Republican, Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, joined Democrats to advance the issue.


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) voted against the bill as a procedural move, enabling him to bring the legislation back for another vote -- which Democrats have vowed to do to continue pounding the issue before the November election.


lisa.mascaro@latimes.com


Twitter: @lisamascaroinDC









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1nIPWIZ

Oprah, Magic interested in Clippers: report - Chicago Tribune


Oprah Winfrey reportedly is interested in bidding on the Los Angeles Clippers if the NBA board of governors is able to force embattled owner Donald Sterling to sell the team, according to one report.


Winfrey, David Geffen and Larry Ellison are joining together to make a bid to buy the Clippers, Geffen told ESPN on Wednesday.


Geffen said the Clippers would be run by him and Ellison, while Winfrey would be an investor.


"Oprah is not interested in running the team," Geffen told ESPN. "She thinks it would be a great thing for an important black American to own (another) franchise.


"The team deserves a better group of owners, who want to win. Larry would sooner die than fail. I would sooner die than fail. Larry's a sportsman, we've talked about this for a long time. Between the three of us, we have a good shot."


Forbes magazine estimates Winfrey, whose eponymous talk show was taped in Chicago, is worth nearly $3 billion, with the NBA’s Clippers worth an estimated $575 million.


NBA Commissioner Adam Silver on Tuesday announced Sterling had been banned from the NBA for life and fined $2.5 million and would invoke league rules to hold a vote to force him to sell the team. He said he expected owners would support the move. It was not clear when any such vote would take place.


Magic Johnson, an NBA Hall of Famer with the L.A. Lakers who has gone on to head an ownership group that purchased the Dodgers, has been mentioned as a possible buyer, and a number of other tycoons have been suggested as being interested in buying the team.


Ellison is the chief executive officer of software giant Oracle Corp.


Geffen, a media mogul with a net worth estimated by Forbes of $6.2 billion, reportedly tried to buy a controlling stake in the Clippers in 2010 but was rebuffed by Sterling, a billionaire who made his fortune in Beverly Hills real estate and bought the Clippers for $12 million in 1981.


What is the team worth?


Sterling paid $12.5 million for the Clippers in 1981. The team sale is going to crush the Bucks' sale price and could reach $1 billion. The NBA is on the verge of signing a new national TV package that is expected to top $2 billion annually, compared to $930 million a year under the old deals. The Clippers local TV deal with Fox Sports expires after the 2015-16 season and will be renewed at a massive premium. The Los Angeles Lakers just kicked off a 20-year, $3.6 billion local deal with Time Warner Cable.


The Clippers and Lakers have the NBA's two longest tenured owners and an NBA franchise has not come up for sale in the L.A. market in more than 30 years. Southern California is loaded with wealthy sports fans that will pay through the nose to join the NBA's exclusive club of owners.


Here are some of the leading candidates, according to Forbes, to be the next owners of the Clippers ranked from highly unlikely to the favorites.


Floyd Mayweather


Mayweather threw his name in the ring Tuesday while talking to the media promoting his Saturday fight with Marcos Maidana in Las Vegas. "I called Al (Haymon) today about that to see if me, Leonard (Ellerbe) and Al, and hopefully Richard (Schaefer) and a couple of other guys, a couple other of my billionaire guys, we can come together and see what we can come up with," Mayweather said. "Hopefully, we can do it, and it's not just talk. Mayweather has made more than $350 million during his boxing career, but carries too much baggage to garner entry into the NBA club. A jail sentence for domestic violence, a penchant for gambling and his own racist rant against Manny Pacquiao are a few of the strikes against a bid involving Mayweather.


Oscar De La Hoya


De La Hoya retired as a boxer in 2009, and has built the biggest boxing promotion firm in the U.S. with the help of Golden Boy Promotions CEO Richard Schaefer. De La Hoya has a statue outside of the Staples Center, but that is likely to be as close as De La Hoya gets to Staples. He has his own baggage, including photos of him in fishnet stockings and multiple trips to rehab.


Billy Crystal


Crystal's name has been bandied about by others. The comedian/actor and long-time Clippers superfan was asked this week about buying the team. He responded in jest: "We're in negotiations." Crystal owns a small piece of the Arizona Diamondbacks, but don't expect him to be the Clippers boss.


Chris Hansen









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1nIPURA

Minimum Wage Boost Blocked in Senate - NBCNews.com


A Democratic bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $10.10 was met with overwhelming Republican opposition in the Senate today, where it failed to garner the 60 votes needed to move past a key procedural hurdle.


The bill, which was introduced by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), would have raised the federal minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $10.10 per hour over the next 30 months, after which automatic annual increases in the minimum wage would be executed to account for inflation. Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee was the only Republican who voted in favor of letting a debate on the measure proceed; it failed by a margin of 54-42.


After the vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), tweeted, "Republicans just turned their backs on millions of hardworking Americans who deserve a fair shot. This debate is not over."


The federal minimum wage has been increased 22 times since it was first implemented in 1938, most recently in 2007 when it was raised from $5.15 per hour to the current $7.25 per hour by Democrats who had just gained control of both chambers of Congress. The annual pay for a full-time minimum wage worker currently sits at $14,500, which is below the poverty line for a household of more than one person.


Public sentiment is on the side of an increase, with 63 percent of Americans saying they would support a minimum wage hike to $10.10 per hour in a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll; but the issue is steeped in politics, with Democrats and President Barack Obama arguing that it will help tens of millions of low income workers climb out of poverty, and Republicans saying that it will kill jobs.


Both sides have studies to back up their claims.


According to an analysis of Harkin’s bill by the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute, the bill would “directly or indirectly raise the wages of 27.8 million workers,” resulting in about $35 billion in additional wages in the next 30 months. EPI also says the bill would create “roughly 85,000 net new jobs” over that same period of time.


The EPI analysis argues that higher wages for lower-income workers will equal more spending, which will subsequently result in higher demand that would boost the economy and could result in the need to hire more workers.


“Senate Republicans assert that increasing the minimum wage will not help working families, that assertion is not only wrong, Mr. President, it makes no sense, it's illogical,” Reid said Wednesday on the Senate floor. “Twenty-eight million Americans stand to benefit from an increase in the minimum wage.”


But Republicans point to a report released by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) in February which says that a federal minimum wage hike to $10.10 per hour could reduce total employment in the United States by as many as one million jobs by the end of 2016, while at the same time resulting in more than 16.5 million people seeing a pay bump of a total estimated $31 billion.


The CBO says that a possible reduction in employment would be due to a number of factors, such as employers passing off the increased costs of workers to consumers, who would then spend less as a result. If a business is producing fewer foods and services because of lower spending by consumers they could hire fewer workers, the CBO says.


Even if the bill had made it through the Democrat-controlled Senate, its fate in the Republican-led House was grim, where House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has been opposed to such measures for decades. Boehner, who in 1996 told The Weekly Standard “I’ll commit suicide before I vote on a clean minimum-wage bill,” reiterated his opposition to the bill again Wednesday through a spokesman.


“The American people are asking, where are the jobs?” Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said in a statement. “But Washington Democrats are pushing policies that would make matters worse, like a minimum wage hike that the CBO says could cost up to a million jobs.”


But Democrats both in the House and Senate see their support for the minimum wage hike, and Republicans’ opposition, as a winning position going into the mid-term elections in November. House Democrats filed a ‘discharge petition’ in February in an attempt to force a vote on a measure to raise the minimum wage to $10.10, but it has only received 195 of the needed 218 signatures, all of which are Democrats.


“House Republicans will have to explain to voters why they oppose raising the minimum wage but will go to the mat for a minimum subsidy for oil companies,” DCCC Chairman Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY) said in a statement. “This election will be about who’s got the back of the middle class, and there are few contrasts more striking than Republicans’ opposition to raising the minimum wage but support for corporate tax breaks.”


Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, says the fact that Republicans oppose the measure is more of an issue of “trust,” saying it’s another example of a do-nothing Congress not acting on an issue Americans care about.


“I think it will make people ask the question, why elect folks if you’re not going to do anything?” Becerra told NBC News. “I think what it does is erodes trust and confidence among the American people for their elected leaders, and I think Republicans in the House do nothing at their peril.”


First published April 30 2014, 9:38 AM









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1lzzM2m

Oklahoma Execution: What Went Wrong and What Happens Now? - NBCNews.com


The execution of Clayton Lockett in Oklahoma began against a backdrop of controversy, with death-row inmates across the country challenging states' last-minute changes to lethal injections and the secrecy that shrouds drug suppliers.


It ended as a nightmare for everyone involved, with the convicted murderer appearing to regain consciousness and struggling to sit up, prison officials halting the execution, and Lockett then dying of a massive heart attack.


Here's a look at what happened at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary on Tuesday night and some of the history behind it:


What went wrong?


It's not entirely clear. The prison director said an intravenous line blew after Lockett was given midazolam, a sedative, and while two other drugs — the paralytic vecuronium bromide and the heart-stopper potassium chloride — were flowing into his body.


Vein problems are not unheard of during executions, but Lockett's appeals team says his veins were perfectly healthy. They suspect there was something wrong with the drugs or the way they were administered.


Lockett's lawyers say the injection was "experimental." Is that true?


The three-drug combination had been used in Florida, but never in Oklahoma. And Oklahoma chose a different dosage of midazolam, a common sedative known by the brand name Versed, so it's accurate to say the exact formula used Tuesday night had not been tested.


Before the execution, Lockett's lawyers tried to force prison officials to reveal where they obtained the lethal dose, saying they should be allowed to investigate how they were prepared and whether they would be effective, but the state's high court ultimately ruled against them.


Image: Charles Warner, Clayton LockettOklahoma Department of Corrections / AP file

Charles Warner, left and Clayton Lockett, right.



Why is Oklahoma using a new cocktail?


The state retooled its protocol after announcing it had not been able to find the drugs for its previous lethal injection combo: pentobarbital and vecuronium bromide.


That's a scenario that has repeated itself across the country as the supply of execution chemicals has dwindled.


Some pharmaceutical companies have refused to sell their products for capital punishment, forcing prisons to turn to less-regulated compounding pharmacies for specially mixed injections. In the wake of bad publicity and legal hassles, some pharmacies have gotten out of the business, too.


States are trying to keep the supply lines open by giving their drug connections anonymity, but defense lawyers contend the secrecy prevents them from investigating whether the injections would violate the constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment.


Is Lockett's execution the first one to go wrong?


At least two recent executions using new cocktails have drawn scrutiny because of complications.


When Michael Lee Wilson, 38, was put to death in January in Oklahoma for the murder of a store clerk, he reportedly blurted out, "My whole body is burning," after the pentobarbital was injected.


In Ohio, Dennis McGuire, 53, took 25 minutes to die and appeared to gasp for breath in January when given an untested cocktail that included midazolam. The state put another execution on hold while it reviewed what was seen by some as a botched procedure.


Earlier this week, Ohio declared that the execution was "humane" and that McGuire — convicted of raping and murdering a pregnant woman — felt no pain.





It has come to our attention that the browser you are using is either not running javascript or out of date. Please enable javascript and/or update your browser if possible.





What happens now?


Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin — who last week accused the state Supreme Court of overstepping its bounds by putting Lockett's execution on temporary hold — said she has ordered a review of his death.


His lawyers are calling for an independent autopsy and the names of the drug sources, though it remains to be seen if that will happen.


The man who was scheduled to die two hours after Lockett, Charles Warner, received at least a 14-day reprieve.


Nationally, death-row inmates continue to challenge changes to execution protocols and laws and policies that keep the suppliers a secret.


Lawmakers in some death-penalty states are also pushing to have other forms of execution — such as firing squad or electric chair — reinstated. Experts on both sides of the debate say it's unlikely that will come to pass on a broad scale because the public is unlikely to embrace non-medical executions.


Some death-penalty foes are predicting the high-profile Lockett disaster — in the wake of publicity about reversed convictions — could erode American support for the death penalty.


What does the U.S. Supreme Court have to say about it?


While several justices indicated they were in favor of a stay of execution in a couple of cases where inmates challenged the drug secrecy, the nation's high court has yet to block an execution because of that issue.


Three weeks ago, the justices declined to take up the case of Christopher Sepulvado, who was sentenced to death for killing his 6-year-old stepson and challenged Louisiana's secrecy rules.


First published April 30 2014, 8:52 AM









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1lzzKYk

Oprah interested in Clippers: report - Chicago Tribune


Oprah Winfrey reportedly is interested in bidding on the Los Angeles Clippers if the NBA board of governors is able to force embattled owner Donald Sterling to sell the team, ESPN reported today.


Citing unnamed sources, a story on ESPN.com said Winfrey is considering teaming up with fellow billionaires David Geffen and Larry Ellison to bid on the Clippers, which Sterling could be compelled to sell if a super-majority of NBA owners vote to force him out in response to racist remarks he was recorded making to a former mistress.


Forbes magazine estimates Winfrey, whose eponymous talk show was taped in Chicago, is worth nearly $3 billion, with the NBA’s Clippers worth an estimated $575 million.


NBA Commissioner Adam Silver on Tuesday announced Sterling had been banned from the NBA for life and fined $2.5 million and would invoke league rules to hold a vote to force him to sell the team. He said he expected owners would support the move. It was not clear when any such vote would take place.


Magic Johnson, an NBA Hall of Famer with the L.A. Lakers who has gone on to head an ownership group that purchased the Dodgers, has been mentioned as a possible buyer, and a number of other tycoons have been suggested as being interested in buying the team.


Ellison is the chief executive officer of software giant Oracle Corp.


Geffen, a media mogul with a net worth estimated by Forbes of $6.2 billion, reportedly tried to buy a controlling stake in the Clippers in 2010 but was rebuffed by Sterling, a billionaire who made his fortune in Beverly Hills real estate and bought the Clippers for $12 million in 1981.


What is the team worth?


Sterling paid $12.5 million for the Clippers in 1981. The team sale is going to crush the Bucks' sale price and could reach $1 billion. The NBA is on the verge of signing a new national TV package that is expected to top $2 billion annually, compared to $930 million a year under the old deals. The Clippers local TV deal with Fox Sports expires after the 2015-16 season and will be renewed at a massive premium. The Los Angeles Lakers just kicked off a 20-year, $3.6 billion local deal with Time Warner Cable.


The Clippers and Lakers have the NBA's two longest tenured owners and an NBA franchise has not come up for sale in the L.A. market in more than 30 years. Southern California is loaded with wealthy sports fans that will pay through the nose to join the NBA's exclusive club of owners.


Here are some of the leading candidates, according to Forbes, to be the next owners of the Clippers ranked from highly unlikely to the favorites.


Floyd Mayweather


Mayweather threw his name in the ring Tuesday while talking to the media promoting his Saturday fight with Marcos Maidana in Las Vegas. "I called Al (Haymon) today about that to see if me, Leonard (Ellerbe) and Al, and hopefully Richard (Schaefer) and a couple of other guys, a couple other of my billionaire guys, we can come together and see what we can come up with," Mayweather said. "Hopefully, we can do it, and it's not just talk. Mayweather has made more than $350 million during his boxing career, but carries too much baggage to garner entry into the NBA club. A jail sentence for domestic violence, a penchant for gambling and his own racist rant against Manny Pacquiao are a few of the strikes against a bid involving Mayweather.


Oscar De La Hoya


De La Hoya retired as a boxer in 2009, and has built the biggest boxing promotion firm in the U.S. with the help of Golden Boy Promotions CEO Richard Schaefer. De La Hoya has a statue outside of the Staples Center, but that is likely to be as close as De La Hoya gets to Staples. He has his own baggage, including photos of him in fishnet stockings and multiple trips to rehab.


Billy Crystal


Crystal's name has been bandied about by others. The comedian/actor and long-time Clippers superfan was asked this week about buying the team. He responded in jest: "We're in negotiations." Crystal owns a small piece of the Arizona Diamondbacks, but don't expect him to be the Clippers boss.


Chris Hansen


The hedge fund manager partnered with former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to try and bring the Sacramento Kings to Seattle with the promise of a new arena. He reached an agreement with the Kings' owners in January 2013, but the relocation and sale were rejected after a Sacramento group led by Vivek Ranadive stepped in to buy the team. Hansen clearly wants an NBA team, but it is highly unlikely the NBA would approve a move by the Clippers to Seattle.


Rick Caruso


Real Estate tycoon Rick Caruso struck out in his bid to buy the Los Angeles Dodgers. He expressed interest this weekin buying the Clippers. Caruso is often labeled a billionaire in the press, but he falls short of theForbes billionaires list.









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1ku6OzQ

Botched Okla. execution prompts demand for changes - USA TODAY



SHARE 147 MORE

The botched execution of a condemned killer in Oklahoma could have far-reaching consequences on American's death penalty process, execution opponents and lawyers for condemned prisoners say.


Clayton Lockett, 38, struggled violently, groaned and writhed after lethal drugs were administered by Oklahoma officials Tuesday night, according to eyewitness accounts. He lifted his head and shoulders as if struggling to sit up on a gurney, fighting against restraints, according to an eyewitness account in the Tulsa World.


As Dean Sutherford, one of two defense lawyers witnessing the execution, began to weep, Lockett appeared to try to speak, uttering only one word – "man" – that witnesses could understand.


After 16 minutes, officials closed off curtains in the death chamber, blocking the view of media witnesses who were present. At one point, prison officials said they were stopping Lockett's execution. But they declared him dead of a heart attack 43 minutes after the injection process began.


"It was extremely difficult to watch," says David Autry, an attorney for Lockett.


Lockett was convicted of shooting a 19-year-old woman and watching two accomplices bury her alive in 1999. Oklahoma had two executions set for Tuesday night, the first time since 1937 the state had planned two deaths on a single day.


After Lockett's death, Gov. Mary Fallin issued a 14-day stay of execution for the second condemned man, Charles Warner, 46, convicted of raping and killing an 11-month-old girl in 1997. He says he is innocent.


Warner's lawyer, Madeline Cohen, says she will seek an independent investigation into Lockett's execution as well as an independent autopsy.


Death penalty states have been struggling in recent years to carry out executions because of a shortage of commonly used drugs, largely because of decisions by manufacturers in Europe to block their use on condemned prisoners.


The result has been a scramble to obtain necessary narcotics. States often rely on compounding pharmacies that can make drugs to order. Many of these pharmacies, however, stop cooperating when their efforts are publicized.


This has led to legal battles between death penalty states and lawyers for condemned prisoners over how much of the death penalty process can remain secret.


States have begun to keep secret about where drugs are obtained. Correction officials such as those in Oklahoma have turned to lethal injection protocols never before used in executions.


The process Oklahoma used Tuesday night involved administering midazolam, an anti-seizure medication, as an anesthetic before paralyzing Lockett with vecuronium bromide and then injecting him with potassium chloride to stop his heart.


Midazolam and vecuronium bromide have been in short supply. But Oklahoma recently informed lawyers for Lockett and Warner that commercially manufactured quantities had been located, although the state refuses to provide more information.


Defense lawyers said the amount of midazolam set for use on Lockett and Warner was one-fifth what had been used on a previous Florida execution, the only other time this three-drug combination had been used.


Department of Corrections Director Robert Patton told reporters Tuesday night that executioners had trouble injecting drugs into Lockett's veins. "His line failed," Patton said, the Tulsa World reported. Asked what that meant, Patton added: "His vein exploded."


Defense attorneys say their fear is that the drug used as an anesthetic will not work properly, leaving the condemned to suffer in agony from the next two drugs administered.


"There's no dispute that potassium chloride (used to stop the heart) is excruciatingly painful," Cohen says. "So the problem is when the first drug doesn't work, the second drug (the paralytic vecuronium bromide) causes a horrible suffocating .. and the third drug scores the veins and causes a terribly painful, horrible heart attack."


The ACLU of Oklahoma issued a statement decrying the death of Lockett as a "hastily thrown together human science experiment" and it called for greater transparency for a process it said has fundamentally failed.


Attorneys for Lockett and Warner had successfully won a stay of execution for both men from a state district judge on March 26. The judge ruled that Oklahoma's secrecy statute for executions was unconstitutional.


The state's Supreme Court later ruled 5-4 to extend the stay.


But that high court reversed itself April 23, clearing the way for the scheduled double execution.


"We have to stop executions until there's been a full investigation, independent investigation and full transparency," says Cohen, who was sitting with three members of Warner's family at an Oklahoma state prison awaiting his execution Tuesday when they learned about Lockett's struggle to die.


Richard Dieter, executive director of the non-profit Death Penalty Information Center, an opponent of executions, said Lockett's manner of death would add momentum to efforts to halt lethal injection until the process is better understood and there is more transparency in states' procedures.


"Somebody died because of the state's incompetency," Dieter says, adding that Louisiana, Kentucky and Ohio considering similar protocols. "I think they're going to have second thoughts and those executions will be delayed."


Dieter says "the burden has shifted to the states to justify why they're picking drugs, where they're getting them and who's performing the executions. There was a terrible breakdown of process of human treatment, of professionalism (in Oklahoma).


Lockett's death is at least the fourth lethal injection death in recent years where witnesses reported condemned prisoners in agony. Previous cases included:


• The Jan. 16 execution of Dennis McGuire in Ohio during which he appeared to struggle and gasp for 20 minutes before dying;


• The execution on Jan. 9 in Oklahoma of Michael Lee Wilson, whose last words were "I feel my whole body burning."


• The 2012 execution in South Dakota of Eric Robert who witnesses said appeared to clear his throat and gasp, his skin turning purplish and his eyes remaining open until he died.


"To get these drugs (executioners) are turning to really, really shady methods of obtaining them that leads to potential contamination, adulteration, expiration," says Cohen, Warner's lawyer. "I can't believe we're still having this fight (over lethal injection) in the wake of this horrible, horrible event."


SHARE 147 MORE








Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1lzrPu7

US economic growth slowed to nearly nothing during cold winter - San Jose Mercury News


WASHINGTON -- The U.S. economy slowed drastically in the first three months of the year as a harsh winter exacted a toll on business activity. The slowdown, while worse than expected, is likely to be temporary as growth rebounds with warmer weather.


Growth slowed to a barely discernible 0.1 percent annual rate in the January-March quarter, the Commerce Department said Wednesday. That was the weakest pace since the end of 2012 and was down from a 2.6 percent rate in the previous quarter.


Many economists said the government's first estimate of growth in the January-March quarter was skewed by weak figures early in the quarter. They noted that several sectors -- from retail sales to manufacturing output -- rebounded in March. That strength should provide momentum for the rest of the year.


And on Friday, economists expect the government to report a solid 200,000-plus job gain for April.


"While quarter one was weak, many measures of sentiment and output improved in March and April, suggesting that the quarter ended better than it began," said Dan Greenhaus, chief investment strategist at global financial services firm BTIG.


Still, the anemic growth last quarter is surely a topic for discussion at the Federal Reserve's latest policy meeting, which ends Wednesday afternoon. No major changes are expected in a statement the Fed will release. But it will likely announce a fourth reduction in its monthly bond purchases because of the gains the economy has been making. The Fed's bond purchases have been intended to keep long-term loan rates low.


In its report Wednesday, the government said consumer spending grew at a 3 percent annual rate last quarter. But that gain was dominated by a 4.4 percent rise in spending on services, reflecting higher utility bills. Spending on goods barely rose. Also dampening growth were a drop in business investment, a rise in the trade deficit and a fall in housing construction.


The scant 0.1 percent growth rate in the gross domestic product, the country's total output of goods and services, was well below the 1.1 percent rise economists had predicted. The last time a quarterly growth rate was so slow was in the final three months of 2012, when it was also 0.1 percent.


Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Marcroeconomics, said he expects the economy's growth to rebound to a 3 percent annual rate in the current April-June quarter. Other economists have made similar forecasts.


A variety of factors held back first-quarter growth. Business investment fell at a 2.1 percent rate, with spending on equipment plunging at a 5.5 percent annual rate. Residential construction fell at a 5.7 percent rate. Housing was hit by winter weather and by other factors such as higher home prices and a shortage of available houses.


A widening of the trade deficit, thanks to a sharp fall in exports, shaved growth by 0.8 percentage point in the first quarter. Businesses also slowed their restocking, with a slowdown in inventory rebuilding reducing growth by nearly 0.6 percentage point.


Also holding back growth: A cutback in spending by state and local governments. That pullback offset a rebound in federal activity after the 16-day partial government shutdown last year.


Economists say most of the factors that held back growth in the first quarter have already begun to reverse. Most expect a strong rebound in growth in the April-June quarter.


Analysts say the stronger growth will endure through the rest of the year as the economy derives help from improved job growth, rising consumer spending and a rebound in business investment.


In fact, many analysts believe 2014 will be the year the recovery from the Great Recession finally achieves the robust growth that's needed to accelerate hiring and reduce still-high unemployment. Many analysts think annual economic growth will remain around 3 percent for the rest of the year.


If that proves accurate, the economy will have produced the fastest annual expansion in the gross domestic product, the broadest gauge of the economy's health, in nine years. The last time growth was so strong was in 2005, when GDP grew 3.4 percent, two years before the nation fell into the worst recession since the 1930s.


A group of economists surveyed this month by The Associated Press said they expected unemployment to fall to 6.2 percent by the end of this year from 6.7 percent in March.


One reason for the optimism is that a drag on growth last year from higher taxes and deep federal spending cuts has been diminishing. A congressional budget truce has also lifted any imminent threat of another government shutdown. As a result, businesses may find it easier to commit to investments to modernize and expand production facilities and boost hiring.


State and local governments, which have benefited from a rebound in tax revenue, are hiring again as well.


Joel Naroff, chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors, said he expects job growth to average above 200,000 a month for the rest of the year -- starting with the April jobs report, which will be released Friday.


"Those are the types of job gains which will generate incomes and consumer confidence going forward," Naroff said.









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1lzrNCp

Oklahoma's botched lethal injection is a new front in battle over executions - CNN





  • NEW: The botch was foreseeable, a death penalty expert says

  • NEW: A CNN poll this year found 50% of Americans support the death penalty for murder

  • NEW: 62% of Americans consider the death penalty morally acceptable

  • Oklahoma inmate Clayton Lockett suffered what appeared to be a heart attack and died




CNN's original series "Death Row Stories" explores America's capital punishment system Sundays at 9 p.m. ET/PT beginning July 13 on CNN. Join the conversation about the death penalty at facebook.com/cnn or Twitter @CNNorigSeries using #DeathRowStories.


(CNN) -- A botched lethal injection in Oklahoma has catapulted the issue of U.S. capital punishment back into the international spotlight, raising new questions about the drugs being used and the constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment.


What went wrong Tuesday in Oklahoma "will not only cause officials in that state to review carefully their execution procedures and methods, it will also almost prompt many Americans across the country to rethink the wisdom, and the morality, of capital punishment," said Richard W. Garnett, a former Supreme Court law clerk who now teaches criminal and constitutional law at the University of Notre Dame.


"The Constitution allows capital punishment in some cases, and so the decision whether to use it or abandon it, and the moral responsibility for its use and misuse, are in our hands."


Precisely what happened during the execution of convicted murderer and rapist Clayton Lockett remains unclear. Witnesses described the man convulsing and writhing on the gurney, as well as struggling to speak, before officials blocked the witnesses from seeing.





Officials: Inmate died from heart attack




Oklahoma reviews execution procedures




Lethal injection goes wrong

It was the state's first time using a new, three-drug cocktail for an execution.


Thirty-two U.S. states have the death penalty, as does the U.S. government and the U.S. military. Since 2009, three states -- New Mexico, Connecticut, and Maryland -- have voted to abolish it.


States that have capital punishment have been forced to find new drugs to use since European-based manufacturers banned U.S. prisons from using theirs for executions. One of those manufacturers is the Danish company Lundbeck, maker of pentobarbital.


'There was chaos'


Lockett lived for 43 minutes after being administered the first drug, CNN affiliate KFOR reported. He got out the words "Man," "I'm not," and "something's wrong," reporter Courtney Francisco of KFOR said. Then the blinds were closed.


Other reporters, including Cary Aspinwall of the Tulsa World newspaper, also said Lockett was still alive and lifted his head while prison officials lowered the blinds so onlookers couldn't see what was going on.


Dean Sanderford, Lockett's attorney, said his client's body "started to twitch," and then "the convulsing got worse. It looked like his whole upper body was trying to lift off the gurney. For a minute, there was chaos."


Sanderford said guards ordered him out of the witness area, and he was never told what had happened to Lockett, who was convicted in 2000 of first-degree murder, rape, kidnapping and robbery.


After administering the first, "We began pushing the second and third drugs in the protocol," said Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director Robert Patton. "There was some concern at that time that the drugs were not having the effect. So the doctor observed the line and determined that the line had blown." He added that Lockett's vein had "exploded."


The execution process was halted, but Lockett died of a heart attack, Patton said.


Precisely what occurred remains unclear. Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin issued a statement saying that "execution officials said Lockett remained unconscious after the lethal injection drugs were administered."


The state halted the execution of another inmate, Charles Warner, which was scheduled for later in the day. "I notified the attorney general's office, the governor's office of my intent to stop the execution and requested a stay for 14 days," said Patton.


Another state, another botched execution


Earlier this year, a convicted murderer and rapist in Ohio, Dennis McGuire, appeared to gasp and convulse for at least 10 minutes before dying from the drug cocktail used in his execution.


Ohio used the sedative midazolam and the painkiller hydromorphone in McGuire's January execution, the state said.


Louisiana announced later that month that it would use the same two-drug cocktail.


Oklahoma had announced the drugs it planned to use: midazolam; vecuronium bromide to stop respiration, and potassium chloride to stop the heart. "Two intravenous lines are inserted, one in each arm. The drugs are injected by hand-held syringes simultaneously into the two intravenous lines. The sequence is in the order that the drugs are listed above. Three executioners are utilized, with each one injecting one of the drugs."


The execution was the first time Oklahoma used midazolam as the first element in its three-drug cocktail. The drug is generally used for children "before medical procedures or before anesthesia for surgery to cause drowsiness, relieve anxiety, and prevent any memory of the event," the U.S. National Library of Medicine says. "It works by slowing activity in the brain to allow relaxation and sleep." The drug "may cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems," so a child should only receive it "in a hospital or doctor's office that has the equipment that is needed to monitor his or her heart and lungs and to provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if his or her breathing slows or stops."


Cruel and unusual?


The question for courts is whether using such drugs in executions constitutes "cruel and unusual" punishment, in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.


After his execution, McGuire's family filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction of the execution protocol the state used.


"The lawsuit alleges that when Mr. McGuire's Ohio execution was carried out on January 16th, he did endure frequent episodes of air hunger and suffocation, as predicted," the office of the family's attorney Richard Schulte said in a statement. "Following administration of the execution protocol, the decedent experienced 'repeated cycles of snorting, gurgling and arching his back, appearing to writhe in pain,' and 'looked and sounded as though he was suffocating.' This continued for 19 minutes."


In Oklahoma, attorneys for both Lockett and Warner have been engaged in a court fight over the drugs used in the state's executions.


They'd initially challenged the state Department of Corrections' unwillingness to divulge which drugs would be used. The department finally disclosed the substances.


Lockett and Warner also took issue with the state's so-called secrecy provision forbidding it from disclosing the identities of anyone involved in the execution process or suppliers of any drugs or medical equipment. The Oklahoma Supreme Court rejected that complaint, saying such secrecy does not prevent the prisoners from challenging their executions as unconstitutional.


After Lockett's execution, Adam Leathers, co-chair of the Oklahoma Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, accused the state of having "tortured a human being in an unconstitutional experimental act of evil."


"Medical and legal experts from around the country had repeatedly warned Oklahoma's governor, courts and Department of Corrections about the likelihood that the protocol intended for use... would be highly problematic," said Deborah Denno, death penalty expert at Fordham Law School.


"This botch was foreseeable and the state (was) ill prepared to deal with the circumstances despite knowing that the entire world was watching. Lethal injection botches have existed for decades but never have they been riskier or more irresponsible than they are in 2014. This outcome is a disgrace," Denno said.


Investigation


The Oklahoma Attorney General's office is "gathering information on what happened in order to evaluate," said spokeswoman Dianne Clay.


Fallin ordered an investigation and issued an executive order granting a 2-week delay in executions.


"I have asked the Department of Corrections to conduct a full review of Oklahoma's execution procedures to determine what happened and why during this evening's execution of Clayton Derrell Lockett," Fallin said in a statement.


Opinion: End secrecy in lethal injections


Lockett was convicted in 2000 of a bevy of crimes that left Stephanie Nieman dead and two people injured.


Warner, who now awaits execution, was convicted in 2003 for the first-degree rape and murder six years earlier of his then-girlfriend's 11-month-old daughter, Adrianna Waller.


His attorney, Madeline Cohen, said further legal action can be expected given that "something went horribly awry" in Lockett's execution Tuesday.


"Oklahoma cannot carry out further executions until there's transparency in this process," Cohen said. "... Oklahoma needs to take a step back."


In a CNN/ORC poll earlier this year, 50% of Americans said the penalty for murder in general should be death, while 45% said it should be a life sentence. The survey's sampling error made that a statistical tie. Fifty-six percent of men supported the death penalty for murder in general, while 45% of women did.


A Gallup poll last year found 62% of Americans believe the death penalty is morally acceptable, while half as many, 31%, consider it morally wrong.


Death penalty Fast Facts


Death penalty in the United States gradually declining


CNN's Dana Ford, Eliott C. McLaughlin and Ross Levitt contributed to this report.









Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1n2L66Y