The Carson City Council unanimously approved a privately financed stadium for the San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders on Tuesday night, barely two months after the public announcement of the proposed $1.7-billion project.
"There are two things we need in California: rain … and football," Carson Mayor Albert Robles said to cheers after the 3-0 decision. "And football is coming to Carson."
The vote continued the proposal’s breakneck pace in the competition with a rival concept in Inglewood to end the NFL’s two-decade absence from the Los Angeles area. In February, Inglewood’s City Council adopted a ballot initiative for a $1.86-billion stadium as part of a sprawling mixed-use development backed by billionaire St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke and Stockbridge Capital.
Representatives of the projects will update a committee of NFL owners on their progress Wednesday during a meeting in New York.
Supporters of the Carson project needed just eight days to collect more than 15,000 signatures in support of their ballot initiative, almost twice the number required.
Like Inglewood, Carson’s City Council had the option of adopting the initiative or scheduling a public vote later this year. The prospect of transforming a long-vacant former municipal landfill site next to the 405 Freeway into a 70,000-seat stadium proved too tempting to delay.
The ballot initiative process allowed both proposals to skip lengthy environmental reviews in a race in which time is of the essence.
The standing-room-only council meeting Tuesday resembled a pep rally. Team officials, union leaders and fans in Chargers and Raiders jerseys all urged the council to approve the stadium.
"We don’t need a vote," said Felix Hernandez, clad in the black No. 81 jersey of Raiders Hall of Famer Tim Brown. “The community has spoken. Football needs to come back to Los Angeles.”
Hernandez then turned to the crowd and chanted: "Bring them back! Bring them back!"
But behind the jubilation, public details about the project remained in short supply.
Carson officials acknowledge that much of the deal with the developers will be negotiated in the coming months. Tuesday's vote is but one step.
The 26-page initiative petition pledged that no tax dollars would be used but contained few specifics about the stadium. Goldman Sachs would lead a 10-figure investment and personal seat licenses are projected to account for about half of the cost.
A city-funded report released over the weekend repeatedly noted the lack of detail: “As of the date of completion of this report, no official project design documents have been provided by the stadium developer.” That report also raised concerns about construction noise and finding another 16,000 off-site parking spots.
Though the report estimated that a one-team stadium could hurt Carson’s budget because the plan would imperil $1.4 million in federal housing funding, AECOM consultant David Stone said Tuesday that estimate was “too conservative,” and “we took that negative number out of our analysis” because the housing could easily be built elsewhere.
"I think this is a good deal for the city," said Stone, who projected that a one-team stadium would boost city coffers by $800,000 in its first year of operation and $168 million total over 40 years.
The complex plan calls for a new city agency and includes a three-way land deal involving the 168-acre property’s current owner, Starwood Capital, the Chargers and Carson. The Chargers’ purchase of the land -- the site of years of failed developments that include a shopping mall and professional football stadium -- is scheduled to close at the end of the month.
"This is an investment in our children and our children's children," Councilman Elito Santarina said.
There are environmental considerations too. Remediation measures for the parcel that sits above deposits of oil, solvents and heavy metals are about 70% complete and need another year to finish.
And both the Chargers and Raiders continue to pursue stadiums in their current cities. But Jeffrey Pollack, a special advisor for the Chargers, insisted the franchise is serious about the Carson plan.
"We are excited about Carson as a shared solution," Pollack told the council.
Anthony Manolatos, spokesman for the Citizens Stadium Advisory Group in San Diego, put the decision to Chargers President Dean Spanos.
"There will be a path to a new stadium here," Manolatos said in a statement. "It sounds like there will be one in L.A. too. If so, it will be up to Mr. Spanos to decide if he wants a new stadium in San Diego or Los Angeles."
Follow Tim Logan on Twitter @bytimlogan
Follow Nathan Fenno on Twitter @nathanfenno
Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles TimesSource: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1zK6R0c
0 comments:
Post a Comment