Friday, August 22, 2014

4:06 PM

By Unknown

In: , , ,

No comments

US Weighs Direct Military Action Against ISIS in Syria - New York Times

HTTP/1.1 302 Found Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 22:58:35 GMT Server: Apache Set-Cookie: NYT-S=deleted; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT; path=/; domain=www.stg.nytimes.com Set-Cookie: NYT-S=0M8T.IhYWjqnzDXrmvxADeHFiGecstK3hpdeFz9JchiAIUFL2BEX5FWcV.Ynx4rkFI; expires=Sun, 21-Sep-2014 22:58:35 GMT; path=/; domain=.nytimes.com Location: http://ift.tt/1l1TkiC Content-Length: 0 Cneonction: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache Cache-Control: no-cache Channels: NytNow Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 22:58:35 GMT X-Varnish: 1882150726 1882149668 Age: 21 Via: 1.1 varnish X-Cache: HIT X-API-Version: 5-5 X-PageType: article Connection: close 002809






Middle East |U.S. Weighs Direct Military Action Against ISIS in Syria



http://nyti.ms/1wigGW8






Middle East |​​NYT Now





Play Video|1:47

U.S. Military Strategy Against ISIS



U.S. Military Strategy Against ISIS



A look at the next military steps the United States is considering in the battle against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.


By Emily B. Hager and Quyn Do on August 21, 2014. Hasan Jamali/Associated Press





EDGARTOWN, Mass. — A top national security adviser to President Obama vowed Friday that the United States would “do what is necessary” in Syria to protect American interests and said that direct military action was possible against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, known as ISIS.


Benjamin J. Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser, said ISIS had become an increased threat to the United States, a threat the American government was taking seriously.


“If you come against Americans, we are going to come after you,” Mr. Rhodes said.


He declined to say whether the president was considering expanding airstrikes to include ISIS targets in Syria as well as in Iraq, where raids began this month. “We’re actively considering what’s going to be necessary in dealing with that threat,” Mr. Rhodes said. “We’re not going to be restricted by borders.”



Related Coverage




  • Militants of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria paraded in the streets of Raqqa, Syria, in June.

    Blamed for ISIS’ Rise in Syria, Assad Is Pushed to Escalate FightAUG. 22, 2014





  • Steven J. Sotloff, 31, was abducted last year while covering the conflict in Syria.

    Steven Sotloff, Journalist Held by ISIS, Was Undeterred by Risks of JobAUG. 22, 2014





On Thursday, Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the only way to defeat ISIS was for the United States or its allies to take the fight to the militants inside Syria. “This is an organization that has an apocalyptic end-of-days strategic vision that will eventually have to be defeated,” Mr. Dempsey told reporters. “Can they be defeated without addressing that part of the organization that resides in Syria? The answer is no.”





OPEN Interactive Graphic



Interactive Graphic: A Rogue State Along Two Rivers


Mr. Rhodes, speaking to reporters on Martha’s Vineyard, where the president is vacationing, said repeatedly on Friday that the administration would do what was necessary in Syria to protect American interests, using language similar to Mr. Obama’s when he announced the airstrikes in Iraq.


“I think the American people understand that this president is very deliberate about military action,” Mr. Rhodes said. “The American people also understand that there are some threats that have to be dealt with.”


Mr. Rhodes declined to say whether the administration would have to seek additional legal authority to conduct airstrikes or other military action inside Syria. He promised that the president and his staff would consult with Congress as the White House considers further military action.


“We will take whatever action is necessary to protect our people,” Mr. Rhodes said. “We will take direct action against terrorists that threaten the United States.”


When Mr. Obama announced airstrikes inside Iraq earlier this month, White House officials noted that the legal basis for the military action was rooted in part on an explicit invitation by the Iraqi government.


There is no chance that the Obama’s administration will receive a similar invitation from President Bashar al-Assad of Syria. Mr. Obama has called on Mr. Assad to step down and has accused him of conducting atrocities against his own people.


Mr. Rhodes declined to speculate about the legal justification for a military operation in Syria that has not yet been announced. But he said the recently disclosed raid inside Syria that failed to rescue American hostages was an example of the kind of action that would be legal. The goal of that operation was to rescue the journalist James Foley, whose execution was recorded on a video that ISIS released this week, and to rescue other Westerners being held with him.


“You don’t need to be invited in if you’re trying to rescue your people from imminent danger,” Mr. Rhodes said.



Site Index











Source: Top Stories - Google News - http://ift.tt/1pnyjyY

0 comments:

Post a Comment